Rates of Dinosaur Body Mass Evolution Indicate 170 Million Years of Sustained Ecological Innovation on the Avian Stem Lineage

Roger Benson, Nicolás E. Campione, Matthew T. Carrano, Philip D. Mannion, Corwin Sullivan, Paul Upchurch, David C. EvansView original
OverviewBalancedriya_rao voice
Ten thousand. That is the number of living dinosaur species on Earth right now. Not fossils in a museum drawer — living, breathing, singing from trees and swooping over coastlines. We call them birds. The question that a team led by Roger Benson just spent a career-scale dataset answering is not why the other dinosaurs went extinct, but why this one lineage didn't just survive. It exploded into ten thousand forms. The answer stretches back one hundred seventy million years, and it changes how we think about where biodiversity comes from. The central puzzle in evolutionary biology is that life is not evenly distributed. Some lineages produce thousands of species; others produce a handful and stop. One influential explanation is adaptive radiation — the idea that when ecological opportunity opens up, lineages diversify rapidly, carving out distinct niches, and then slow down as the available roles fill up. This is called the early-burst model: fast evolution early, deceleration later. It is elegant. It is intuitive. However, when researchers go looking for it in real data — in island lizards, in African cichlid fishes, in Darwin's finches — they mostly don't find it. Harmon and colleagues and others have shown that clean early-burst signatures are surprisingly rare across comparative datasets. Part of the problem may be timescale. Most of these studies examine clades younger than about ten million years. If niche-filling dynamics operate over hundreds of millions of years, you need a system that actually spans that kind of time. Dinosaurs do. Benson and colleagues assembled something formidable: composite phylogenetic trees containing six hundred fourteen to six hundred twenty-two Mesozoic dinosaurs and birds, paired with body-mass estimates for four hundred forty-one of those taxa. Body mass was estimated from the scaling relationship between stylopodial shaft circumference — the cross-sectional girth of the major limb bones — and mass, using a universal relationship derived from living tetrapods by Campione and Evans. Limb bones are ideal for this because they bear weight, they preserve well, and the scaling relationship is well validated. All estimates were log-transformed, and the team reports a standard error of zero point one thirty-five log units per estimate. To handle uncertainty in both tree topology and timing, they analyzed sixty time-calibrated phylogenies, reporting results as medians across that whole set. Two main analytical tools drove the findings. The node-height test checks whether evolutionary rates correlate with when in the tree a branch appears — early branches should show fast rates under the early-burst model. Technically, this means regressing standardized independent contrasts against the log-transformed geological age of each node using robust regression. The second tool was maximum-likelihood model comparison: fitting explicit models of trait evolution — early burst, Brownian motion, directional trend, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck — and ranking them by corrected Akaike information criterion, or AICc. The first result is exactly what early-burst theory predicts, and it is striking. Triassic dinosaurs show rapid rates of body-mass evolution. Node-height tests find significant inverse relationships between evolutionary rate and node age across most non-maniraptoran subclades. When Triassic nodes are excluded from the analysis, that signal disappears — meaning the pattern is specifically rooted in the earliest history of the group. Model fitting confirms it: early-burst models receive a median AICc weight of zero point nine six for non-maniraptoran dinosaurs as a whole. In sauropodomorphs — the long-necked giants — that weight is zero point six nine. In ornithischians, it is zero point six four. What "rapid shifts among size classes" looks like in practice is dramatic. Most early dinosaurs clustered between about ten and thirty-five kilograms. Then, in the Triassic and Early Jurassic, lineages catapulted to extreme sizes in both directions. Antetonitrus reached five thousand six hundred kilograms. Vulcanodon hit nine thousand eight hundred kilograms. At the other end, Epidexipteryx weighed just zero point four kilograms; Anchiornis, zero point seven kilograms. Benson and colleagues identify five sets of exceptional Triassic and Early Jurassic nodes representing these rapid jumps — lineages leaping from medium-bodied generalist ancestors into roles as enormous herbivores or tiny insectivores. As the theory predicts, most lineages slowed down. Rates declined. Niches filled. The early burst faded. Except in one group. Maniraptora — the theropod subgroup that includes Velociraptor, Archaeopteryx, and ultimately all modern birds — did not follow the script. While every other major dinosaur clade shows the expected deceleration, maniraptorans sustained rapid rates of body-mass evolution from at least the Middle Jurassic onward. The quantitative contrast is not subtle. When maniraptorans are excluded from the dataset, the early-burst signal is clean and strong. When they are included, it vanishes — because their sustained rapid rates through later time wash out the pattern entirely. Maximum-likelihood model fitting for Maniraptora alone finds essentially zero support for an early burst: the AICc weight for that model is zero point zero zero. Instead, an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model — which describes evolution oscillating around shifting optima — receives a median AICc weight of zero point nine nine eight across all sixty trees. These animals kept moving. They kept finding new ecological space when their relatives had stopped. The evidence of that movement is concrete. Benson and colleagues record up to six exceptional rate nodes in Jurassic theropods alone, and at least seven more rapid size shifts among maniraptorans during the Cretaceous. The taxa at the center of this — animals like Microraptor at one point five kilograms, Archaeopteryx at about one kilogram, and the Mesozoic avialans ranging from thirteen grams to one hundred ninety kilograms — represent a lineage that kept breaching ecological boundaries its relatives had left untouched. One proposed explanation is that sustained small body size opened ecological space inaccessible to larger dinosaurs. Benson and colleagues note that more niches may be available near one hundred grams than at larger sizes, and maniraptorans were repeatedly able to push below the one to three kilogram floor that constrained most other dinosaur lineages. This is where the theoretical stakes become clear. The early-burst model imagines biodiversity as a race to fill a fixed set of slots. You burst out of the gate, claim your niche, and settle in. But maniraptorans behaved as if the number of slots kept expanding — or as if they kept finding ways to generate new ones. Benson and colleagues invoke two explanatory frameworks. The first is evolvability: the capacity of a lineage to keep producing heritable variation relevant to ecological performance. Some lineages appear to maintain this capacity across vast timescales; most do not. The second is the Red Queen dynamic — the idea that lineages must keep evolving just to persist in a changing biotic environment. Non-maniraptoran dinosaurs may have failed this race: unable to keep pace with shifting ecological pressures, they saturated their niches and eventually became vulnerable. Maniraptorans kept running. The broader implication the paper raises is that the uneven distribution of biodiversity across major groups may not simply reflect differences in ecological opportunity or post-extinction luck. It may reflect differences in long-term evolvability — sustained capacity for rapid trait evolution that, over deep time, produces the kind of lineage that can seed a second great radiation. Benson and colleagues note similar possibilities for crustaceans and ray-finned fishes, suggesting this may be a general principle rather than a dinosaur-specific story. Which brings us back to ten thousand species. This study shows that number is not a rebound, not a post-extinction windfall. It is the accumulated dividend of one hundred seventy million years of sustained ecological innovation on the avian stem lineage. While the non-avian dinosaurs followed the classic arc — fast start, niche saturation, slow fade — the ancestors of birds kept evolving. They kept shifting. They kept finding new ecological roles through the Jurassic and the Cretaceous, building the evolvability that the crown radiation would eventually spend. The line between "extinct" and "alive" in the dinosaur story is far less clean than the popular narrative suggests. The most species-rich class of living vertebrates is a dinosaur radiation that simply never stopped. This lecture was created by ennepō. Go to https://ennepo.ai to Discover, Create and Follow the latest research in your field. Read when you can. Listen when you want to.

Ten thousand. That is the number of living dinosaur species on Earth right now. Not fossils in a museum drawer — living, breathing, singing from trees and swooping over coastlines. We call them birds. The question that a team led by Roger Benson just spent a career-scale dataset answering is not why the other dinosaurs went extinct, but why this one lineage didn't just survive. It exploded into ten thousand forms. The answer stretches back one hundred seventy million years, and it changes how we think about where biodiversity comes from. The central puzzle in evolutionary biology is that life is not evenly distributed. Some lineages produce thousands of species; others produce a handful and stop. One influential explanation is adaptive radiation — the idea that when ecological opportunity opens up, lineages diversify rapidly, carving out distinct niches, and then slow down as the available roles fill up. This is called the early-burst model: fast evolution early, deceleration later. It is elegant. It is intuitive. However, when researchers go looking for it in real data — in island lizards, in African cichlid fishes, in Darwin's finches — they mostly don't find it. Harmon and colleagues and others have shown that clean early-burst signatures are surprisingly rare across comparative datasets. Part of the problem may be timescale.

Most of these studies examine clades younger than about ten million years. If niche-filling dynamics operate over hundreds of millions of years, you need a system that actually spans that kind of time. Dinosaurs do. Benson and colleagues assembled something formidable: composite phylogenetic trees containing six hundred fourteen to six hundred twenty-two Mesozoic dinosaurs and birds, paired with body-mass estimates for four hundred forty-one of those taxa. Body mass was estimated from the scaling relationship between stylopodial shaft circumference — the cross-sectional girth of the major limb bones — and mass, using a universal relationship derived from living tetrapods by Campione and Evans. Limb bones are ideal for this because they bear weight, they preserve well, and the scaling relationship is well validated. All estimates were log-transformed, and the team reports a standard error of zero point one thirty-five log units per estimate. To handle uncertainty in both tree topology and timing, they analyzed sixty time-calibrated phylogenies, reporting results as medians across that whole set. Two main analytical tools drove the findings. The node-height test checks whether evolutionary rates correlate with when in the tree a branch appears — early branches should show fast rates under the early-burst model. Technically, this means regressing standardized independent contrasts against the log-transformed geological age of each node using robust regression.

The second tool was maximum-likelihood model comparison: fitting explicit models of trait evolution — early burst, Brownian motion, directional trend, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck — and ranking them by corrected Akaike information criterion, or AICc. The first result is exactly what early-burst theory predicts, and it is striking. Triassic dinosaurs show rapid rates of body-mass evolution. Node-height tests find significant inverse relationships between evolutionary rate and node age across most non-maniraptoran subclades. When Triassic nodes are excluded from the analysis, that signal disappears — meaning the pattern is specifically rooted in the earliest history of the group. Model fitting confirms it: early-burst models receive a median AICc weight of zero point nine six for non-maniraptoran dinosaurs as a whole. In sauropodomorphs — the long-necked giants — that weight is zero point six nine. In ornithischians, it is zero point six four. What "rapid shifts among size classes" looks like in practice is dramatic. Most early dinosaurs clustered between about ten and thirty-five kilograms. Then, in the Triassic and Early Jurassic, lineages catapulted to extreme sizes in both directions. Antetonitrus reached five thousand six hundred kilograms. Vulcanodon hit nine thousand eight hundred kilograms. At the other end, Epidexipteryx weighed just zero point four kilograms;

Anchiornis, zero point seven kilograms. Benson and colleagues identify five sets of exceptional Triassic and Early Jurassic nodes representing these rapid jumps — lineages leaping from medium-bodied generalist ancestors into roles as enormous herbivores or tiny insectivores. As the theory predicts, most lineages slowed down. Rates declined. Niches filled. The early burst faded. Except in one group. Maniraptora — the theropod subgroup that includes Velociraptor, Archaeopteryx, and ultimately all modern birds — did not follow the script. While every other major dinosaur clade shows the expected deceleration, maniraptorans sustained rapid rates of body-mass evolution from at least the Middle Jurassic onward. The quantitative contrast is not subtle. When maniraptorans are excluded from the dataset, the early-burst signal is clean and strong. When they are included, it vanishes — because their sustained rapid rates through later time wash out the pattern entirely. Maximum-likelihood model fitting for Maniraptora alone finds essentially zero support for an early burst: the AICc weight for that model is zero point zero zero. Instead, an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model — which describes evolution oscillating around shifting optima — receives a median AICc weight of zero point nine nine eight across all sixty trees. These animals kept moving. They kept finding new ecological space when their relatives had stopped.

The evidence of that movement is concrete. Benson and colleagues record up to six exceptional rate nodes in Jurassic theropods alone, and at least seven more rapid size shifts among maniraptorans during the Cretaceous. The taxa at the center of this — animals like Microraptor at one point five kilograms, Archaeopteryx at about one kilogram, and the Mesozoic avialans ranging from thirteen grams to one hundred ninety kilograms — represent a lineage that kept breaching ecological boundaries its relatives had left untouched. One proposed explanation is that sustained small body size opened ecological space inaccessible to larger dinosaurs. Benson and colleagues note that more niches may be available near one hundred grams than at larger sizes, and maniraptorans were repeatedly able to push below the one to three kilogram floor that constrained most other dinosaur lineages. This is where the theoretical stakes become clear. The early-burst model imagines biodiversity as a race to fill a fixed set of slots. You burst out of the gate, claim your niche, and settle in. But maniraptorans behaved as if the number of slots kept expanding — or as if they kept finding ways to generate new ones. Benson and colleagues invoke two explanatory frameworks. The first is evolvability: the capacity of a lineage to keep producing heritable variation relevant to ecological performance.

Some lineages appear to maintain this capacity across vast timescales; most do not. The second is the Red Queen dynamic — the idea that lineages must keep evolving just to persist in a changing biotic environment. Non-maniraptoran dinosaurs may have failed this race: unable to keep pace with shifting ecological pressures, they saturated their niches and eventually became vulnerable. Maniraptorans kept running. The broader implication the paper raises is that the uneven distribution of biodiversity across major groups may not simply reflect differences in ecological opportunity or post-extinction luck. It may reflect differences in long-term evolvability — sustained capacity for rapid trait evolution that, over deep time, produces the kind of lineage that can seed a second great radiation. Benson and colleagues note similar possibilities for crustaceans and ray-finned fishes, suggesting this may be a general principle rather than a dinosaur-specific story. Which brings us back to ten thousand species. This study shows that number is not a rebound, not a post-extinction windfall. It is the accumulated dividend of one hundred seventy million years of sustained ecological innovation on the avian stem lineage.

While the non-avian dinosaurs followed the classic arc — fast start, niche saturation, slow fade — the ancestors of birds kept evolving. They kept shifting. They kept finding new ecological roles through the Jurassic and the Cretaceous, building the evolvability that the crown radiation would eventually spend. The line between "extinct" and "alive" in the dinosaur story is far less clean than the popular narrative suggests. The most species-rich class of living vertebrates is a dinosaur radiation that simply never stopped. This lecture was created by ennepō. Go to https://ennepo.ai to Discover, Create and Follow the latest research in your field. Read when you can. Listen when you want to.

More in Earth and Planetary Sciences